Criteria Cognitive Aptitude Test 2025 – Complete Practice Resource

Disable ads (and more) with a premium pass for a one time $4.99 payment

Question: 1 / 185

Based on the hierarchy given, what can we say about Professor Glickman's relationship to Mr. Abelard?

Glickman is Mr. Abelard's superior

Glickman is Mr. Abelard's peer

Glickman is lower than Mr. Abelard

Cannot say

The appropriate choice, indicating that we cannot determine the relationship between Professor Glickman and Mr. Abelard based on the provided hierarchy, stems from the ambiguity that may exist in such situations. Hierarchies can vary widely depending on the context—such as departmental structures, academic roles, or professional organizations—and without specific details regarding the roles or positions held by Glickman and Abelard, we cannot definitively classify their relationship.

For instance, if the hierarchy were specified—for instance, if it included titles such as "Professor" and "Assistant" or "Senior Lecturer"—one could potentially derive the relationships based on typical academic standings. However, without that context or enough information regarding their exact positions, one cannot conclude whether one is superior, peers, or subordinate to the other. Hence, arriving at a definitive answer is not possible without further information, making the indication that we cannot say the best choice.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta
Next

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy